District of Columbia data on LEA MOE reductions and use of funds for CEIS

July 13th, 2011

IDEA Money Watch has obtained the information submitted by the District of Columbia to the U.S. Dept. of Education regarding reduction to local spending (maintenance of effort or  MOE) and use of federal IDEA funds for Coordinated Early Intervening Services (CEIS) for each school district for the 2009 fiscal year. Get District of Columbia information here. (PDF,  12 pgs).

This information is important because it indicates if school districts reduced local spending in light of IDEA Recovery Act funds in FY 2009. IDEA does not require that local districts replace these funds when the Recovery funds run out, putting services for students with disabilities at risk.

DCPS pledges special education reform (again!)

October 19th, 2010

By Deborah Simmons for The Washington Times

Michelle A. Rhee may be on her way out as chancellor of D.C. Public Schools, but the fights she waged over the city’s education policies are likely to linger long after she is gone.

For City Council Chairman Vincent C. Gray, Ms. Rhee’s most prominent critic and the all-but-elected next mayor of the city, the first fight may be over something he and the departing chancellor actually agreed on — curbing the city’s spiraling costs for special education.  Read the full story here.

IDEA Money Watch comments :: “Reform” might be too weak a word for what’s needed to fix special education in the District of Columbia.  As we have reported here, this jurisdiction is having a portion of its federal IDEA funds withheld by the U.S. Dept. of Education due to its complete and utter failure to implement the basic requirements of IDEA. As we reported in What’s Doin’ in DC, the jurisdiction has been designated a  “high-risk grantee” by U.S. Dept. of Education. It leads the nation in the number of special education students attending private schools at public expense (costing $280 million annually) and is also under a court ordered agreement resulting from a class action suit brought by DC parents.  A plan announced in July would provide vouchers for special education students.

As we approach the 35th anniversary of the passage of the nation’s special education law in 1975, it is ironic that one of two landmark cases that lead to federal special education legislation happened in the District of Columbia, Mills vs. Board of Education. Little seems to have changed in the past 35 years in DC.

SEPTEMBER 2010 :: DC still lagging behind in IDEA Recovery Act spending

October 8th, 2010

As of September 30, 2010: According to spending reports released by the U.S. Dept. of Education, the District of Columbia has obligated just 10% of its IDEA Part B Recovery funds, or just $1,594,305 of more than $16.4 million available to it . The national average is 50%. Spending details by local school district are available at EdMoney.org

Current spending reports are always available here. All IDEA Recovery Act funds must be obligated by September 30, 2011.

DC still at 10% on spending of IDEA Recovery Act funds

September 6th, 2010

According to the August 27, 2010 spending report issued by the US Dept. of Education, DC has obligated 10% – or $1,594,305 – of its IDEA Part B Recovery Act funds – or . All funds must be obligated by Sept. 30, 2011.

What’s Doin’ in DC

August 18th, 2010

Each month when we update our State-by-State ARRA Spending Reports, we wonder about the low rate of obligation of the $16.4 million IDEA Part B funds available to the District of Columbia. As of July 30, 2010, DC showed having spent just 8% of its available funds – or a little over $1 million. We found this particularly interesting given DC’s long history of extremely poor performance in implementing the basic provisions of IDEA. In fact, for the past 2 years the U.S. Dept. of Education has designated DC as a “high-risk grantee” and has withheld a portion of IDEA Part B annual funds as a sanction for the jurisdiction’s poor performance (as allowable by IDEA). (Much of DC’s compliance problems are discussed in the 2010 and 2009 letters for USED.)

So, we put out some feelers and ended up having a nice conversation with Tami Lewis, Assistant Superintendent for Special Education at the Office of the State Superintendent of Education (OSSE). Turns out that the apparent lack of spending and the “high-risk” grantee designation are inextricably linked! One of the corrective actions that OSSE  imposed on its local educational agencies (LEAs) is the payment of all federal education grant funds on a “reimbursement basis.”  That means that DC’s LEAs (the largest being District of Columbia Public Schools – DCPS) must spend their own funds for activities allowable under federal education grants – like Title I, IDEA – then submit a request for reimbursement to the state. The state – in this case OSSE – then verifies the request and, if approved, draws the money from its US grant funds and reimburses the LEA. This process of reimbursement – vs. providing the federal funds in advance of expenditures and monitoring their use in hindsight – creates a substantial lag time in the obligation of federal funds being reported by USED.

Lewis expects the DC obligation rate to be around 60% by the end of September 2010. At this writing, the OSSE is in the process of verifying a $9 million reimbursement request from DCPS for IDEA ARRA funds. That’s a whopping 70% of the $12.9 million in IDEA ARRA funds slated for DCPS.

IDEA Money Watch can’t comment on the value of the activities being funded in DC by ARRA funds – we’ll leave that to its citizens. But we appreciate the willingness of Lewis to provide information about the process. And we hope that ARRA funds are used to move DC toward improved implementation of special education services and away from its “high-risk grantee” status.

Good luck, DC.

August 18, 2010


IDEA Excerpts From: Investing Wisely and Quickly Use of ARRA Funds in America’s Great City Schools

May 26th, 2010

District of Columbia

Just before the economic downturn, District of Columbia Public Schools (DCPS) changed its school budgeting formula in an effort to bring art, music, and physical education teachers, and wraparound social services, to all the school system’s children, as well as job‐embedded professional development to teachers. Funds available to the district under the State Fiscal Stabilization Fund (SFSF) will enable the school system to maintain this newly designed equity during the recession and continue to direct necessary funds to schools by preserving the comprehensive staffing model for school budgeting.

The SFSF will also enable the school system to continue implementing much‐needed innovation. For example, a portion of the stimulus funds distributed to schools will support those participating in the DCPS Collaborative. School leaders in the collaborative’s successful schools work closely and intensively with the leaders of the district’s most struggling schools. Principals meet regularly to address various issues, observe successful initiatives, and present their discoveries and results to non‐collaborative schools. This model allows principals to demonstrate best practices, create shared accountability, and increase the achievement levels of the lower- performing schools.

The school system will use Title I stimulus funds to support innovative out‐of‐school-time programs and the people who make them happen, such as the full‐time coordinators who recruit high‐quality programs for their schools and implement accountability measures for all after-school work. Stimulus funds can also assist the district in providing much‐needed additional instructional time through the Saturday Scholars Program, evening credit‐recovery classes, and summer school.

ARRA funding can also assist the school system in its dedicated effort to turn around special education, an effort that will continue through the recession. The school system has a great need to offer successful programs to all students. A good example is the district’s autism program, which has been praised for its innovation in serving children on the autism spectrum. The district also has a similar high-quality program for students with Asperser’s syndrome, and the stimulus funds will be used to replicate these types of successes throughout new programs across the district.

IDEA funds from ARRA will also be directed toward reforming the Individualized Education Program (IEP) process by engaging parents more fully in their children’s education. This step represents a basic but important improvement from past action, and the district believes it is especially vital that this reform continues through the recession. In addition, IEPs are not currently available in an electronic form for the staff members who refer to them. With the support of stimulus funds, the district is working to add IEPs into a secure database for the first time.

The school district has also committed to building a state-of-the-art early childhood center that would identify children at a young age, provide services immediately upon assessment, and ultimately help address the issue of overrepresentation of students in special education. With the support of stimulus funds, District of Columbia Public Schools hopes to move forward on this project, as well as to develop a process for moving students out of special education before they transition to middle or high school.

For the full report Click Here.

City to Pull 170 Students From Private School

September 28th, 2009

A Springfield private school that is paid by the District of Columbia to provide education to students with special needs is in danger of closing after the District decided this week to pull its students, citing concerns about the quality of instruction.

Accotink Academy, which has worked with District students for more than 15 years, received an e-mail Wednesday from Richard Nyankori, the District’s deputy chancellor for special education, who informed the school that 170 students were being pulled in the coming weeks.

Accotink Academy said it had not been told of any concerns before notices were sent to parents Tuesday. They also said the academy’s teachers were highly qualified and that the school wasn’t going down without a fight.

Most of the academy’s students are from the District, and the school, which has been open since 1964, will be forced to close if they are pulled, said Elaine N. McConnell, the academy’s founder.

The District has nearly 9,300 special education students, including those in public charter schools, and about 30 percent of them are enrolled in private schools because the District can’t meet their needs. The cost to taxpayers in tuition and transportation is about $200 million a year. Accotink Academy has been receiving about $10 million a year from the D.C. school system, according to District figures.

Read the full story here.

D.C. to Ask Judge to Dismiss Special Education Court Order

September 17th, 2009

Washington Post :: Wednesday, September 16, 2009

“Citing improved performance and a recent Supreme Court ruling, the District soon will ask a federal judge to dismiss a 2006 court order that requires it to provide timely assistance to a backlog of families seeking special education services from public and public charter schools.”  Full article.

IDEA Money Watch responds: My oh my! We have to guess that DC has yet to read that letter they got from OSEP about their implementation of IDEA. And we’d really like to know what DC plans to do with their IDEA Part B ARRA money – some $16.5 million!

We stand corrected!

August 13th, 2009

We got emails about our assertion that D.C. has only one LEA! In fact, there are 61 LEAs, because most DC charter schools are LEAs… However, as Ira at the Bazelon Center – one of the finest advocacy organizations around for students with disabilities – informs us, most charter schools don’t fulfill any responsibilities that LEAs have under IDEA….

So, while DCPS isn’t the ONLY LEA in DC, it is the one that produced the data on which the USEd’s letter was based…. we’ll check back w/ the DC office of the state superintendent (OSSE) to see if they have been able to sort their way through the data and make LEA determinations, as required by IDEA regulations! (IDEA also required SEAs to post all LEA data on the most recent annual performance report by May 1, 2009 — OSSE’s site has NO LEA data available!)

Perplexed in (and by) D.C.

July 15th, 2009

The Office of the State Superintendent of Education in Washington, D.C., responded to our request for the LEA RATING for its ONE AND ONLY LEA with the following email dated Friday, June 19, 2009:

“This letter responds to your Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request originally sent to Mr. Richard Nyankori on June 3, 2009 and received in the Office of the State Superintendent of Education (OSSE) on June 3, 2009.  Please note that pursuant to D.C. Official Code § 2-532(b), an agency’s initial response time has been extended from 10 to 15 working days.

We have completed a search for the documents you requested.  I regret to inform you that we are currently unable to produce documents to fulfill the first part of your request for:
“electronic copies of documentation regarding the specific rating assigned to each LEA in the State with respect to the targets in the State’s performance plan (SPP). “

This is the first academic year in which the OSSE is conducting special education monitoring as a state agency, and the agency has not yet issued LEA determinations.  We intend to complete the monitoring process and issue determinations soon.  As a result, we are requesting a 10-day extension as pursuant to D.C. Official Code § 2-532(d) providing a total of 25 business days to respond to your request.

If you have any questions or concerns regarding this matter, please contact me at (202) 481-3783 or via email at kortne.edogun@dc.gov “

IDEA MONEY WATCH responds: Hey, OSSE! This might come as a BIG SURPRISE…but you’ve only got ONE school district! It’s the same district that produced the dismal results that got you the letter from USED — and a notice that you will begin to have federal IDEA funds withheld…So what, we ask, is so hard about making a determination about your ONE LEA??? This kind of management is the reason why DC is in such a special education mess.  In case that letter from USED got lost in the mail, a copy is posted here. The Annual Performance Report on which the USED determination is based is available here.